Search for: All records

Singlet–triplet (ST) gaps are key descriptors of carbenes, because their properties and reactivity are strongly spin-dependent. However, the theoretical prediction of ST gaps is challenging and generally thought to require elaborate correlated wave function methods or double-hybrid density functionals. By evaluating two recent test sets of arylcarbenes (AC12 and AC18), we show that local hybrid functionals based on the “common t” local mixing function (LMF) model achieve mean absolute errors below 1 kcal/mol at a computational cost only slightly higher than that of global hybrid functionals. An analysis of correlation contributions to the ST gaps suggests that the accuracy of the common t-LMF model is mainly due to an improved description of nondynamical correlation which, unlike exchange, is not additive in each spin-channel. Although spin-nonadditivity can be achieved using the local spin polarization alone, using the “common”, i.e., spin-unresolved, iso-orbital indicator t for constructing the LMF is found to be critical for consistent accuracy in ST gaps of arylcarbenes. The results support the view of LHs as vehicles to improve the description of nondynamical correlation rather than sophisticated exchange mixing approaches. 

To expand the range of donor atoms known to stabilize 4fⁿ5d¹Ln(ii) ions beyond C, N, and O first row main group donor atoms, the Ln(iii) terphenylthiolate iodides, Ln^III(SAr^iPr6)₂I (Ar^iPr6= C₆H₃-2,6-(C₆H₂-2,4,6-ⁱPr₃)₂, Ln = La, Nd) were reduced to Ln^II(SAr^iPr6)₂complexes. 

Computational studies of the coordination chemistry and bonding of lanthanides have grown in recent decades as the need for understanding the distinct physical, optical, and magnetic properties of these compounds increased. Density functional theory (DFT) methods offer a favorable balance of computational cost and accuracy in lanthanide chemistry and have helped to advance the discovery of novel oxidation states and electronic configurations. This Frontier article examines the scope and limitations of DFT in interpreting structural and spectroscopic data of low-valent lanthanide complexes, elucidating periodic trends, and predicting their properties and reactivity, presented through selected examples.